J 2022

Mechanisms of change in multicomponent group-based treatment for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms

ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš, Michal ČEVELÍČEK, Jan R. BOEHNKE, Martina POUROVÁ, Jan ROUBAL et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Mechanisms of change in multicomponent group-based treatment for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms

Authors

ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš, Michal ČEVELÍČEK, Jan R. BOEHNKE, Martina POUROVÁ and Jan ROUBAL

Edition

Psychotherapy Research, Abingdon, Francis, 2022, 1050-3307

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Article in a journal

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

References:

Organization

Fakulta sociálních studií – Repository – Repository

UT WoS

000783423000001

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85129281535

Keywords in English

medically unexplained physical symptoms; multicomponent treatment; group psychotherapy; change mechanisms

Links

GA18-08512S, research and development project.
Changed: 21/2/2023 04:43, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

V originále

Objective: Understanding psychological mechanisms of change is essential to advance treatments for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). This study aimed to test the role of selected change mechanisms (incl. interoceptive awareness, emotional regulation skills, symptom acceptance, relational needs satisfaction, clarification of meaning, working alliance, and group cohesion) in the modification of patients’ somatic symptom intensity and well-being. Method: N = 290 patients suffering from MUPS participated in a multi-component group-based treatment at seven clinical sites. Data were collected weekly. Multi-level modeling was used to test cross-lagged relationships between the hypothesized mechanisms and outcomes in terms of Granger causality (with lags of 1, 2, and 3 weeks). Results: None of the mechanisms predicted a time-lagged change in outcomes in the expected direction. In fact, there was a consistent pattern of negative time-lagged relationships (i.e., an increase in a mechanism predicted worsening of the outcome). Findings consistent with the hypothesized role of the mechanisms were found only in concurrent relationships between mechanisms and outcomes. Conclusion: This study did not support time-lagged relationships under the condition of weekly measurement and many methodological factors remain to be considered (e.g., a finer time resolution).

Files attached