Přehled o publikaci
2022
Mechanisms of change in multicomponent group-based treatment for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms
ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš, Michal ČEVELÍČEK, Jan R. BOEHNKE, Martina POUROVÁ, Jan ROUBAL et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Mechanisms of change in multicomponent group-based treatment for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms
Autoři
ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš, Michal ČEVELÍČEK, Jan R. BOEHNKE, Martina POUROVÁ a Jan ROUBAL
Vydání
Psychotherapy Research, Abingdon, Francis, 2022, 1050-3307
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Organizace
Fakulta sociálních studií – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
UT WoS
000783423000001
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85129281535
Klíčová slova anglicky
medically unexplained physical symptoms; multicomponent treatment; group psychotherapy; change mechanisms
Návaznosti
GA18-08512S, projekt VaV.
Změněno: 21. 2. 2023 04:43, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Anotace
V originále
Objective: Understanding psychological mechanisms of change is essential to advance treatments for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). This study aimed to test the role of selected change mechanisms (incl. interoceptive awareness, emotional regulation skills, symptom acceptance, relational needs satisfaction, clarification of meaning, working alliance, and group cohesion) in the modification of patients’ somatic symptom intensity and well-being. Method: N = 290 patients suffering from MUPS participated in a multi-component group-based treatment at seven clinical sites. Data were collected weekly. Multi-level modeling was used to test cross-lagged relationships between the hypothesized mechanisms and outcomes in terms of Granger causality (with lags of 1, 2, and 3 weeks). Results: None of the mechanisms predicted a time-lagged change in outcomes in the expected direction. In fact, there was a consistent pattern of negative time-lagged relationships (i.e., an increase in a mechanism predicted worsening of the outcome). Findings consistent with the hypothesized role of the mechanisms were found only in concurrent relationships between mechanisms and outcomes. Conclusion: This study did not support time-lagged relationships under the condition of weekly measurement and many methodological factors remain to be considered (e.g., a finer time resolution).