2017
Nad návrhem zákona o statusu veřejné prospěšnosti
DĚDIČ, Jan and Kateřina RONOVSKÁBasic information
Original name
Nad návrhem zákona o statusu veřejné prospěšnosti
Name (in English)
About the Draft of the Act on Public Benefit Status
Authors
DĚDIČ, Jan (203 Czech Republic) and Kateřina RONOVSKÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Správní právo, Praha, Ministerstvo vnitra, 2017, 0139-6005
Other information
Language
Czech
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
Legal sciences
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/17:00097584
Organization
Právnická fakulta – Repository – Repository
Keywords (in Czech)
rekodifikace soukromého práva; veřejná prospěšnost; status veřejné prospěšnosti; návrh zákona o statusu veřejné prospěšnosti
Keywords in English
Recodification of private law; legal persons; public benefit status; draft of the Act on Public benefit Status
Changed: 4/9/2020 12:21, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
V originále
Článek věnuje pozornost návrhu a předkládá kritickou analýzu návrhu zákona o statusu veřejné prospěšnosti, který i přes negativní stanovisko LRV, schválila Vláda ČR.
In English
The new Czech Civil Code (in effect from January, 1th, 2014) conceptually grasped „public benefit“ as a "feature" or "character" of a legal person whose purpose is to contribute to the achievement of the common good regardless of the chosen legal form. At the same time, Section 147 CC foresees the adoption of a special regulation that would allow the registration of the public benefit status in the public registry of legal persons. In January 2017, the Government of the Czech Republic submitted to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic a draft of such a regulation on public benefit status for discussion. Unfortunately, the draft suffers from a general conceptual and content defect, value-based inaccuracy, and, last but not least, inadequate interdependence with the rest of the legal order. In the case of its adoption, it could eventually lead to bad consequences, which is an effect quite opposite to what the government promises