D 2016

Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation

KRČÁL, Michal and Michal KUBIŠ

Basic information

Original name

Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation

Authors

KRČÁL, Michal and Michal KUBIŠ

Edition

Porto, Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, p. 190 - 198, 9 pp. 2016

Publisher

SCITEPRESS

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Proceedings paper

Field of Study

Management, administration and clerical work

Country of publisher

Portugal

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

Publication form

storage medium (CD, DVD, flash disk)

Marked to be transferred to RIV

Yes

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14560/16:00091724

Organization

Ekonomicko-správní fakulta – Repository – Repository

ISBN

978-989-758-203-5

EID Scopus

Keywords in English

Knowledge Management; Information Management; Comparison; Information Systems
Changed: 3/9/2020 12:37, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

In the original language

In Knowledge Management (KM) discipline, the nature of KM itself has long been discussed and sometimes even its existence and meaning have been questioned. At the same time, research focusing on the difference between KM and Information Management (IM) was scarce. Therefore we tried through empirical investigation of differences between KM and IM to distinguish the KM from IM and to try to draw a distinct line between both approaches. To fulfil our goal we employed exploratory inductive qualitative research design as not many studies have tried to empirically distinguish KM from IM. For data gathering we used expert semi-structured interviews. The interviews and also results were structured according to 8 perspectives: conceptual, process, technological, organisational, implementation, human resources, economical, and administration. For each perspective, we examined the context of IM and KM and analysed, described and interpreted the differences.

Files attached