Přehled o publikaci
2016
Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation
KRČÁL, Michal and Michal KUBIŠBasic information
Original name
Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation
Authors
KRČÁL, Michal and Michal KUBIŠ
Edition
Porto, Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, p. 190 - 198, 9 pp. 2016
Publisher
SCITEPRESS
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Proceedings paper
Field of Study
Management, administration and clerical work
Country of publisher
Portugal
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form
storage medium (CD, DVD, flash disk)
Marked to be transferred to RIV
Yes
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14560/16:00091724
Organization
Ekonomicko-správní fakulta – Repository – Repository
ISBN
978-989-758-203-5
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Keywords in English
Knowledge Management; Information Management; Comparison; Information Systems
Changed: 3/9/2020 12:37, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Abstract
In the original language
In Knowledge Management (KM) discipline, the nature of KM itself has long been discussed and sometimes even its existence and meaning have been questioned. At the same time, research focusing on the difference between KM and Information Management (IM) was scarce. Therefore we tried through empirical investigation of differences between KM and IM to distinguish the KM from IM and to try to draw a distinct line between both approaches. To fulfil our goal we employed exploratory inductive qualitative research design as not many studies have tried to empirically distinguish KM from IM. For data gathering we used expert semi-structured interviews. The interviews and also results were structured according to 8 perspectives: conceptual, process, technological, organisational, implementation, human resources, economical, and administration. For each perspective, we examined the context of IM and KM and analysed, described and interpreted the differences.