Přehled o publikaci
2025
Effect of different antiseptic skin agents on bacterial contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats
PAVLIK, Matej; Andrea NECASOVA; Vera VAIBAROVA; Danka HARUŠTIAKOVÁ; Alois NECAS et al.Basic information
Original name
Effect of different antiseptic skin agents on bacterial contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats
Authors
PAVLIK, Matej; Andrea NECASOVA; Vera VAIBAROVA; Danka HARUŠTIAKOVÁ and Alois NECAS
Edition
Acta veterinaria (Brno), Brno, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, 2025, 0001-7213
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Marked to be transferred to RIV
No
Organization
Přírodovědecká fakulta – Repository – Repository
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Keywords in English
Alcohol; bacteraemia; chlorhexidine; microbiology; sepsis
Changed: 14/1/2026 00:51, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Abstract
In the original language
This study evaluated the effect of selected antiseptic skin agents (alcohol, chlorhexidine, and their combination) on the level of microbial contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters. Atotal of 83 animals (73 dogs and 10 cats) in which a peripheral intravenous catheter was inserted were evaluated. Prior to insertion, one of the tested antiseptic agents was used to prepare the site of catheter insertion. For each animal, microbiological examination of two skin swabs (taken before and after application of antiseptic skin agent) and a sample from the catheter after it was removed from the vessel was performed and the duration of catheter placement in the vessel was also recorded. Regarding the proportion of positive microbiological culture result, no significant difference was found between the three antiseptic agents in the rate of bacterial contamination of the skin (P = 0.552) or the peripheral intravenous catheter (P = 0.597). The intravenous catheter contamination rate tended to increase with the duration of hospitalization, although this relationship was not significant (P = 0.309). Bacteria isolated from contaminated catheters matched bacteria isolated from the skin of the same animal in one case only. Our results confirm the effectiveness of individual skin antiseptic agents and suggest that contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters occurs primarily from the environment during patient's hospitalization, rather than as a consequence of insufficient aseptic skin preparation at the site of catheter insertion.