J 2025

Effect of different antiseptic skin agents on bacterial contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats

PAVLIK, Matej; Andrea NECASOVA; Vera VAIBAROVA; Danka HARUŠTIAKOVÁ; Alois NECAS et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Effect of different antiseptic skin agents on bacterial contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters in dogs and cats

Autoři

PAVLIK, Matej; Andrea NECASOVA; Vera VAIBAROVA; Danka HARUŠTIAKOVÁ a Alois NECAS

Vydání

Acta veterinaria (Brno), Brno, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, 2025, 0001-7213

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ne

Organizace

Přírodovědecká fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

Alcohol; bacteraemia; chlorhexidine; microbiology; sepsis
Změněno: 14. 1. 2026 00:51, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Anotace

V originále

This study evaluated the effect of selected antiseptic skin agents (alcohol, chlorhexidine, and their combination) on the level of microbial contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters. Atotal of 83 animals (73 dogs and 10 cats) in which a peripheral intravenous catheter was inserted were evaluated. Prior to insertion, one of the tested antiseptic agents was used to prepare the site of catheter insertion. For each animal, microbiological examination of two skin swabs (taken before and after application of antiseptic skin agent) and a sample from the catheter after it was removed from the vessel was performed and the duration of catheter placement in the vessel was also recorded. Regarding the proportion of positive microbiological culture result, no significant difference was found between the three antiseptic agents in the rate of bacterial contamination of the skin (P = 0.552) or the peripheral intravenous catheter (P = 0.597). The intravenous catheter contamination rate tended to increase with the duration of hospitalization, although this relationship was not significant (P = 0.309). Bacteria isolated from contaminated catheters matched bacteria isolated from the skin of the same animal in one case only. Our results confirm the effectiveness of individual skin antiseptic agents and suggest that contamination of peripheral intravenous catheters occurs primarily from the environment during patient's hospitalization, rather than as a consequence of insufficient aseptic skin preparation at the site of catheter insertion.

Přiložené soubory