Přehled o publikaci
2023
Informality and Courts: Uneasy Partnership
KOSAŘ, David; Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ a Marína URBÁNIKOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Informality and Courts: Uneasy Partnership
Autoři
KOSAŘ, David; Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ a Marína URBÁNIKOVÁ
Vydání
German Law Journal, Frankfurt am Main, Goethe University Frankfurt, 2023, 2071-8322
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133878
Organizace
Právnická fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
informal institutions ; courts ; judges ; judicial culture ; constitutional conventions ; democratic decay
Návaznosti
101002660, interní kód Repo.
Změněno: 28. 6. 2024 04:39, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Anotace
V originále
This introductory Article provides a conceptual umbrella for the Special Issue on Informal Institutions and Democratic Decay. It offers conceptual clarity to studying informal institutions and explains their relationship to other concepts such as constitutional conventions or judicial culture. The article summarizes findings of the Special issue in four key observations. First, it shows that it is impossible to understand the functioning of courts without understanding the informal rules that shape courts’ governance and decision-making. These informal rules (institutions) appear within courts (internal), between courts and other actors (mixed) and among non-judicial actors with effects on courts (external judicial institutions). Second, it identifies a strong trend of formalization of rules, sponsored mostly on the supranational European level .Third, it explains why reforms of formal rules are often not sufficient to trigger behavioral changes and highlights the role of informal institutions in created commitment of actors to key democratic principles. Fourth, it argues that informal judicial institutions significantly impact the quality of democracy.