Přehled o publikaci

The paper focuses on the distinction between two types of reforms (or reforms and anti-reforms) using the tools of positional investment analysis: a) reforms that solve the problem by moving society to a "higher level" of dynamic, environmentally friendly and human-oriented economic development (where the development of human capabilities is the most significant factor of economic growth), in which mutual trust between those who govern the country and those who live in the country grows; b) anti-reforms ("people's reforms") that block positive changes in the development of society, demotivate the population, exacerbate relations within society, and open up space for positional investment by domestic and foreign lobbies, i.e., space for the transformation of already acquired property and positional advantages into an even greater redistribution of the wealth created in their favour. Current events in the Czech Republic, using the concrete example of pension issues, allow us to demonstrate the importance of the tools of description and analysis of positional investing to clearly distinguish between reforms and anti-reforms.