Podrobný výpis o publikaci

@proceedings{55946,
   author = {Caha, Pavel},
   booktitle = {GLOW 46, Vienna, 12. 4. 2023},
   keywords = {clitics; strong pronouns; syncretism; default case},
   language = {eng},
   title = {A default theory of default case},
   url = {https://glowlinguistics.org/46/main-session-day-1/},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 55946
AU  - Caha, Pavel
PY  - 2023
TI  - A default theory of default case
KW  - clitics
KW  - strong pronouns
KW  - syncretism
KW  - default case
UR  - https://glowlinguistics.org/46/main-session-day-1/
N2  - Schütze (2001) argues that UG makes use of the so‐called Default Case (DEF). The notion refers to “case forms used to spell out nominals that do not receive a case specification in the syntax”. The current paper presents a theory of Default Case in Schütze’s spirit, but one that is more restrictive in terms of the case values allowed for Default Case and its syntactic distribution. A crucial part of the proposal is the idea that English distinguishes between strong and clitic forms of pronouns, and that pronouns such as "me" are three-way ambiguous (clitic accusative, strong accusative/nominative).
ER  - 

CAHA, Pavel. A default theory of default case. In \textit{GLOW 46, Vienna, 12. 4. 2023}. 2023.