Přehled o publikaci
2020
Facets of the psychotherapy relationship : a metaphorical approach
ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš; Jan ROUBAL and Katarína MOTALOVÁBasic information
Original name
Facets of the psychotherapy relationship : a metaphorical approach
Authors
ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution); Jan ROUBAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Katarína MOTALOVÁ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Research in Psychotherapy : Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, Milan, PAGE Press, 2020, 2239-8031
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Country of publisher
Italy
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14230/20:00114739
Organization
Fakulta sociálních studií – Repository – Repository
UT WoS
000609153600012
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85100295119
Keywords in English
Metaphor; professional role; psychotherapy relationship; survey; theoretical orientation
Links
GA18-08512S, research and development project.
Changed: 24/10/2025 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Abstract
In the original language
Although many separate aspects of the psychotherapy relationship have been studied, including empathy, working alliance, and self-disclosure, a metaphorical approach has the potential to generate a more holistic perspective of this phenomenon. Hence, the goal of this study was to explore the nature of the psychotherapy relationship from the psychotherapists’ perspective using a metaphorical approach. In an online survey, a sample of N=373 Czech psychotherapists and counselors rated a set of relational metaphors in terms of how accurately they depicted their roles in their relationships with their clients. The single most endorsed metaphor for the practitioner’s role was a guide. Furthermore, the principal component analysis identified three relational components, namely, Mentor, Resource Supplier, and Remedy Distributor. The associations among these components and multiple practitioners’ variables, including demographic and practice-related variables and theoretical orientation, were explored. These three components represent general dimensions of the psychotherapy relationship that cut across various theoretical orientations and, thus, define psychotherapy relationships in a general sense.