k 2012

The Use of Euphemisms as the Highest Form of Doublespeak in American Presidential Debates

REICH, Pavel

Basic information

Original name

The Use of Euphemisms as the Highest Form of Doublespeak in American Presidential Debates

Authors

REICH, Pavel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

A Culture of Language, Brno, 2012

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Presentations at conferences

Field of Study

Linguistics

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14640/12:00063976

Organization

Centrum jazykového vzdělávání – Repository – Repository

Keywords in English

euphemism; doublespeak; presidential debates
Changed: 1/9/2020 14:59, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

V originále

The paper focuses on the use of euphemisms in American presidential debates in the years 2000, 2004 and 2008. Euphemisms are one of the forms of doublespeak, i.e. language that is used in order to manipulate people’s thought and influence their perception of reality. A euphemism is usually used when the original word has very negative affective associations. The speaker strategically chooses a word which somehow stresses the positive or optimistic aspect of a phenomenon and the negative or pessimistic aspect is thus played down. There are several processes how euphemisms are created. The research has shown that in addition to widening of meaning, metaphor, and metonymy, euphemisms are very often composed of two other lower forms of doublespeak: “purr” words and positive hidden bias. The aim of the paper is to show how euphemisms are used in order to promote the presidential candidates’ viewpoints on particular issues.

Files attached