MALANÍK, Michal. The element of intuition in legal decision-making. In Argumentation 2019. Brno: Masaryk University, 2019, p. 1-20. ISBN 978-80-210-9445-1.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The element of intuition in legal decision-making
Authors MALANÍK, Michal (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Brno, Argumentation 2019, p. 1-20, 20 pp. 2019.
Publisher Masaryk University
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/19:00112864
Organization Právnická fakulta – Repository – Repository
ISBN 978-80-210-9445-1
UT WoS 000670577900001
Keywords in English Decision-Making; Judges; Intuition
Changed by Changed by: RNDr. Daniel Jakubík, učo 139797. Changed: 18/8/2021 02:01.
Abstract
This paper focuses on the elements that influence judges throughout their decision-making process, namely it tries to point out a few pressing questions about judges’ intuition. American legal realists, attempting to disprove certain elements of legal formalism tried to set a light to judges’ practice, claiming that judges are deciding cases on the basis of their beliefs and legal hunching (their intuition) instead of blindly following the legal rules and interpretive doctrines, and using their rationalization to bolster their intuitive decision with the doctrinal principles rather than derive the decision out of them. During the last few decades there were various researches conducted studying the decision-making processes of the judges in connection to their political affiliations, race, education, demographics etc., but very few of those were focused solely on the element of intuition. That being said about the American legal space this paper points out that almost no relevant research exists in the Czech legal background. Thus, the paper emphasizes the importance of (further) studies in this field and introduces a pilot research conducted on selected Czech Supreme Court justices focusing on their decision-making process.
Type Name Uploaded/Created by Uploaded/Created Rights
argumentation_2019.pdf Licence Creative Commons  File version 15/8/2020

Properties

Name
argumentation_2019.pdf
Address within IS
https://repozitar.cz/auth/repo/39046/874196/
Address for the users outside IS
https://repozitar.cz/repo/39046/874196/
Address within Manager
https://repozitar.cz/auth/repo/39046/874196/?info
Address within Manager for the users outside IS
https://repozitar.cz/repo/39046/874196/?info
Uploaded/Created
Sat 15/8/2020 09:21

Rights

Right to read
  • anyone on the Internet
Right to upload
 
Right to administer:
  • a concrete person Mgr. Lucie Vařechová, uco 106253
  • a concrete person RNDr. Daniel Jakubík, uco 139797
  • a concrete person Mgr. Jolana Surýnková, uco 220973
Attributes
 
Print
Add to clipboard Displayed: 20/5/2024 23:18