Přehled o publikaci
2016
Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation
KRČÁL, Michal a Michal KUBIŠZákladní údaje
Originální název
Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation
Autoři
KRČÁL, Michal a Michal KUBIŠ
Vydání
Porto, Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, od s. 190 - 198, 9 s. 2016
Nakladatel
SCITEPRESS
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
Řízení, správa a administrativa
Stát vydavatele
Portugalsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
paměťový nosič (CD, DVD, flash disk)
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14560/16:00091724
Organizace
Ekonomicko-správní fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
ISBN
978-989-758-203-5
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Knowledge Management; Information Management; Comparison; Information Systems
Změněno: 3. 9. 2020 12:37, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Anotace
V originále
In Knowledge Management (KM) discipline, the nature of KM itself has long been discussed and sometimes even its existence and meaning have been questioned. At the same time, research focusing on the difference between KM and Information Management (IM) was scarce. Therefore we tried through empirical investigation of differences between KM and IM to distinguish the KM from IM and to try to draw a distinct line between both approaches. To fulfil our goal we employed exploratory inductive qualitative research design as not many studies have tried to empirically distinguish KM from IM. For data gathering we used expert semi-structured interviews. The interviews and also results were structured according to 8 perspectives: conceptual, process, technological, organisational, implementation, human resources, economical, and administration. For each perspective, we examined the context of IM and KM and analysed, described and interpreted the differences.