J 2025

Psychotherapists’ Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring : A Qualitative Meta-analysis

JONÁŠOVÁ, Klára; Michal ČEVELÍČEK; Petr DOLEŽAL a Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK

Základní údaje

Originální název

Psychotherapists’ Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring : A Qualitative Meta-analysis

Autoři

JONÁŠOVÁ, Klára; Michal ČEVELÍČEK; Petr DOLEŽAL a Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK

Vydání

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, New York, Springer, 2025, 0894-587X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ne

Organizace

Fakulta sociálních studií – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

Routine outcome monitoring; Qualitative meta-analysis; Therapists’ experience; Clinicians’ perspective; In-session use

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1446/2022, interní kód Repo.
Změněno: 19. 2. 2026 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Anotace

V originále

Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has become an increasingly utilized tool in therapeutic practice that has the potential to improve therapy outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize the findings of existing qualitative studies investigating how clinicians use ROM in their work with clients. A systematic search of qualitative studies on clinicians’ experience with the use of ROM in mental health services was conducted via PsycInfo, PsycArticles, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Qualitative meta-analysis was used to synthesize the finding of the primary studies. Forty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis resulted in 21 meta-categories organized into six clusters, namely (1) obtaining clinically relevant information, (2) adapting treatment, (3) facilitating communication, (4) enhancing the therapeutic relationship, (5) facilitating change in clients, and (6) personalized usage of ROM. The meta-analysis revealed that clinicians utilized ROM in diverse ways, including both informational and communicational functions. From the clinicians’ perspective, ROM was an element that, on the one hand, introduced additional structure and standardization in treatment and, on the other hand, allowed for greater flexibility and tailoring of treatment.

Přiložené soubory