Přehled o publikaci
2025
Psychotherapists’ Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring : A Qualitative Meta-analysis
JONÁŠOVÁ, Klára; Michal ČEVELÍČEK; Petr DOLEŽAL a Tomáš ŘIHÁČEKZákladní údaje
Originální název
Psychotherapists’ Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring : A Qualitative Meta-analysis
Autoři
JONÁŠOVÁ, Klára; Michal ČEVELÍČEK; Petr DOLEŽAL a Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK
Vydání
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, New York, Springer, 2025, 0894-587X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizace
Fakulta sociálních studií – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Routine outcome monitoring; Qualitative meta-analysis; Therapists’ experience; Clinicians’ perspective; In-session use
Návaznosti
MUNI/A/1446/2022, interní kód Repo.
Změněno: 19. 2. 2026 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Anotace
V originále
Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has become an increasingly utilized tool in therapeutic practice that has the potential to improve therapy outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize the findings of existing qualitative studies investigating how clinicians use ROM in their work with clients. A systematic search of qualitative studies on clinicians’ experience with the use of ROM in mental health services was conducted via PsycInfo, PsycArticles, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Qualitative meta-analysis was used to synthesize the finding of the primary studies. Forty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis resulted in 21 meta-categories organized into six clusters, namely (1) obtaining clinically relevant information, (2) adapting treatment, (3) facilitating communication, (4) enhancing the therapeutic relationship, (5) facilitating change in clients, and (6) personalized usage of ROM. The meta-analysis revealed that clinicians utilized ROM in diverse ways, including both informational and communicational functions. From the clinicians’ perspective, ROM was an element that, on the one hand, introduced additional structure and standardization in treatment and, on the other hand, allowed for greater flexibility and tailoring of treatment.