Přehled o publikaci
2025
Psychotherapists’ Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring : A Qualitative Meta-analysis
JONÁŠOVÁ, Klára; Michal ČEVELÍČEK; Petr DOLEŽAL and Tomáš ŘIHÁČEKBasic information
Original name
Psychotherapists’ Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring : A Qualitative Meta-analysis
Authors
JONÁŠOVÁ, Klára; Michal ČEVELÍČEK; Petr DOLEŽAL and Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK
Edition
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, New York, Springer, 2025, 0894-587X
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Marked to be transferred to RIV
No
Organization
Fakulta sociálních studií – Repository – Repository
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Keywords in English
Routine outcome monitoring; Qualitative meta-analysis; Therapists’ experience; Clinicians’ perspective; In-session use
Links
MUNI/A/1446/2022, interní kód Repo.
Changed: 19/2/2026 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Abstract
In the original language
Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has become an increasingly utilized tool in therapeutic practice that has the potential to improve therapy outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize the findings of existing qualitative studies investigating how clinicians use ROM in their work with clients. A systematic search of qualitative studies on clinicians’ experience with the use of ROM in mental health services was conducted via PsycInfo, PsycArticles, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Qualitative meta-analysis was used to synthesize the finding of the primary studies. Forty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis resulted in 21 meta-categories organized into six clusters, namely (1) obtaining clinically relevant information, (2) adapting treatment, (3) facilitating communication, (4) enhancing the therapeutic relationship, (5) facilitating change in clients, and (6) personalized usage of ROM. The meta-analysis revealed that clinicians utilized ROM in diverse ways, including both informational and communicational functions. From the clinicians’ perspective, ROM was an element that, on the one hand, introduced additional structure and standardization in treatment and, on the other hand, allowed for greater flexibility and tailoring of treatment.