Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@proceedings{55946, author = {Caha, Pavel}, booktitle = {GLOW 46, Vienna, 12. 4. 2023}, keywords = {clitics; strong pronouns; syncretism; default case}, language = {eng}, title = {A default theory of default case}, url = {https://glowlinguistics.org/46/main-session-day-1/}, year = {2023} }
TY - CONF ID - 55946 AU - Caha, Pavel PY - 2023 TI - A default theory of default case KW - clitics KW - strong pronouns KW - syncretism KW - default case UR - https://glowlinguistics.org/46/main-session-day-1/ N2 - Schütze (2001) argues that UG makes use of the so‐called Default Case (DEF). The notion refers to “case forms used to spell out nominals that do not receive a case specification in the syntax”. The current paper presents a theory of Default Case in Schütze’s spirit, but one that is more restrictive in terms of the case values allowed for Default Case and its syntactic distribution. A crucial part of the proposal is the idea that English distinguishes between strong and clitic forms of pronouns, and that pronouns such as "me" are three-way ambiguous (clitic accusative, strong accusative/nominative). ER -
CAHA, Pavel. A default theory of default case. In \textit{GLOW 46, Vienna, 12. 4. 2023}. 2023.
|