Podrobný výpis o publikaci

@article{36606,
   author = {Kahvandi, Zahra and Saghatforoush, Ehsan and Zareravasan, Ahad and Preece, Christopher},
   article_location = {Tehran, Iran},
   article_number = {8},
   keywords = {Integrated Project Delivery (IPD); Challenges; Project Key Stakeholders; Construction; Robust Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2476-3055},
   journal = {Civil Engineering Journal},
   title = {Integrated Project Delivery Implementation Challenges in the Construction Industry},
   url = {https://www.civilejournal.org/index.php/cej/article/view/1490/pdf},
   volume = {5},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 36606
AU  - Kahvandi, Zahra - Saghatforoush, Ehsan - Zareravasan, Ahad - Preece, Christopher
PY  - 2019
TI  - Integrated Project Delivery Implementation Challenges in the Construction Industry
JF  - Civil Engineering Journal
VL  - 5
IS  - 8
SP  - 1672-1683
EP  - 1672-1683
PB  - K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
SN  - 2476-3055
KW  - Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
KW  - Challenges
KW  - Project Key Stakeholders
KW  - Construction
KW  - Robust Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
UR  - https://www.civilejournal.org/index.php/cej/article/view/1490/pdf
N2  - Huge financial resources are spent in the construction industry all over the world, which are frequently wasted largely due to a lack of proper planning. In recent decades, in an attempt to overcome challenges, various contractual and administrative systems have been used by construction owners/clients. One such system has been Integrated Project Delivery (IPD). Its implementation has, however, experienced drawbacks. Identifying such drawbacks is an initial step in attempting to resolve them, and this paper aims to identify and prioritize the IPD implementation drawbacks in the context of the Iranian construction industry. A comprehensive list of IPD implementation drawbacks is prepared using a questionnaire survey. An in-depth literature review of the IPD concept has been combined with a review of various case studies applying the IPD system. The results were analyzed using the Robust Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method. 22 drawbacks in the Construction Industry were categorized under four themes; contractual, environmental, managerial, and technical. Results show that contractual drawbacks are the most significant. The implication of this research is that identifying and classifying IPD implementation drawbacks provides a useful reference to managers and owners of the construction industry, for identifying and codifying solutions to overcome them.
ER  - 

KAHVANDI, Zahra, Ehsan SAGHATFOROUSH, Ahad ZARERAVASAN a Christopher PREECE. Integrated Project Delivery Implementation Challenges in the Construction Industry. \textit{Civil Engineering Journal}. Tehran, Iran: K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, 2019, roč.~5, č.~8, s.~1672-1683. ISSN~2476-3055.