KRČÁL, Michal and Michal KUBIŠ. Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Porto: SCITEPRESS. p. 190 - 198. ISBN 978-989-758-203-5. 2016.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Differences between knowledge and information management practices: empirical investigation
Authors KRČÁL, Michal (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Michal KUBIŠ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Porto, Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, p. 190 - 198, 9 pp. 2016.
Publisher SCITEPRESS
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study Management, administration and clerical work
Country of publisher Portugal
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form storage medium (CD, DVD, flash disk)
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14560/16:00091724
Organization Ekonomicko-správní fakulta – Repository – Repository
ISBN 978-989-758-203-5
UT WoS 000393154200020
Keywords in English Knowledge Management; Information Management; Comparison; Information Systems
Changed by Changed by: RNDr. Daniel Jakubík, učo 139797. Changed: 3/9/2020 12:37.
Abstract
In Knowledge Management (KM) discipline, the nature of KM itself has long been discussed and sometimes even its existence and meaning have been questioned. At the same time, research focusing on the difference between KM and Information Management (IM) was scarce. Therefore we tried through empirical investigation of differences between KM and IM to distinguish the KM from IM and to try to draw a distinct line between both approaches. To fulfil our goal we employed exploratory inductive qualitative research design as not many studies have tried to empirically distinguish KM from IM. For data gathering we used expert semi-structured interviews. The interviews and also results were structured according to 8 perspectives: conceptual, process, technological, organisational, implementation, human resources, economical, and administration. For each perspective, we examined the context of IM and KM and analysed, described and interpreted the differences.
Type Name Uploaded/Created by Uploaded/Created Rights
Final_revised_submission_2.pdf Licence Creative Commons  File version 23/10/2018

Properties

Name
Final_revised_submission_2.pdf
Address within IS
https://repozitar.cz/auth/repo/30746/582889/
Address for the users outside IS
https://repozitar.cz/repo/30746/582889/
Address within Manager
https://repozitar.cz/auth/repo/30746/582889/?info
Address within Manager for the users outside IS
https://repozitar.cz/repo/30746/582889/?info
Uploaded/Created
Tue 23/10/2018 00:59

Rights

Right to read
  • anyone on the Internet
Right to upload
 
Right to administer:
  • a concrete person Mgr. Lucie Vařechová, uco 106253
  • a concrete person RNDr. Daniel Jakubík, uco 139797
  • a concrete person Mgr. Jolana Surýnková, uco 220973
Attributes
 
Final_revised_submission_2.pdf Licence Creative Commons  File version 3/9/2020

Properties

Name
Final_revised_submission_2.pdf
Address within IS
https://repozitar.cz/auth/repo/30746/902075/
Address for the users outside IS
https://repozitar.cz/repo/30746/902075/
Address within Manager
https://repozitar.cz/auth/repo/30746/902075/?info
Address within Manager for the users outside IS
https://repozitar.cz/repo/30746/902075/?info
Uploaded/Created
Thu 3/9/2020 12:37

Rights

Right to read
  • anyone on the Internet
Right to upload
 
Right to administer:
  • a concrete person Mgr. Lucie Vařechová, uco 106253
  • a concrete person RNDr. Daniel Jakubík, uco 139797
  • a concrete person Mgr. Jolana Surýnková, uco 220973
Attributes
 
Print
Add to clipboard Displayed: 28/3/2024 18:11