J 2025

Individualized therapeutic approaches for relapsed and refractory pediatric ependymomas: a single institution experience.

TINKA, Pavel, Petra POKORNÁ, Michal KÝR, Zdeněk PAVELKA, Klára VEJMĚLKOVÁ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Individualized therapeutic approaches for relapsed and refractory pediatric ependymomas: a single institution experience.

Name in Czech

Individualizované léčebné přístupy pro relabující a refraktorní pediatrické ependymomy: zkušenost 1 centra

Authors

TINKA, Pavel, Petra POKORNÁ, Michal KÝR, Zdeněk PAVELKA, Klára VEJMĚLKOVÁ, Hana PÁLOVÁ, Jakub NERADIL, Marta JEŽOVÁ, Ondřej SLABÝ and Jaroslav ŠTĚRBA

Edition

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, NEW YORK, SPRINGER, 2025, 0167-594X

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Article in a journal

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

References:

Organization

Lékařská fakulta – Repository – Repository

UT WoS

001468187000001

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-105005079061

Keywords in English

Refractory, Relapsed, Pediatric ependymoma, Individualized treatment, Targeted therapy, Molecular profling

Links

LM2023067, research and development project. LX22NPO5102, research and development project. MUNI/A/1764/2024, interní kód Repo. NU20-03-00240, research and development project. NV19-03-00562, research and development project.
Changed: 30/5/2025 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

V originále

Purpose This retrospective study aims to show a real-life single-center experience with clinical management of relapsed pediatric ependymomas using results from comprehensive molecular profiling. Methods Eight relapsed ependymomas were tested by whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, phosphoproteomic arrays, array comparative genome hybridization, and immunohistochemistry staining for PD-L1 expression and treated with an individualized approach implementing targeted inhibitors, immunotherapy, antiangiogenic metronomic treatment, or other agents. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), survival after relapse (SAR), and PFS ratios. Results Genomic analyses did not reveal any therapeutically actionable alterations. Surgery remained the cornerstone of patient treatment, supplemented by adjuvant radiotherapy. Empiric agents were chosen quite frequently, often involving drug repurposing. In six patients, prolonged PFS after relapse was seen because of immunotherapy, MEMMAT, or empiric agents and is reflected in the PFS ratio ≥ 1. The 5-year OS was 88%, the 10-year OS was 73%, the 2-year SAR was 88%, and the 5-year SAR was 66%. Conclusion We demonstrated the feasibility and good safety profile. Promising was the effect of immunotherapy on ZFTA-positive ependymomas. However, further research is required to establish the most effective approach for achieving sustained remission in these patients.

Files attached