Přehled o publikaci
2023
Evaluating Sentence Alignment Methods in a Low-Resource Setting: An English-YorùBá Study Case
SIGNORONI, Edoardo and Pavel RYCHLÝBasic information
Original name
Evaluating Sentence Alignment Methods in a Low-Resource Setting: An English-YorùBá Study Case
Authors
SIGNORONI, Edoardo and Pavel RYCHLÝ
Edition
Stroudsburg, PA 18360, Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Technologies for Machine Translation of Low-Resource Languages (LoResMT 2023), p. 123-129, 7 pp. 2023
Publisher
Association for Computational Linguistics
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Proceedings paper
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form
electronic version available online
References:
Marked to be transferred to RIV
No
Organization
Fakulta informatiky – Repository – Repository
ISBN
978-1-959429-55-5
EID Scopus
Keywords in English
NLP;low-resource;sentence alignment
Links
LM2023062, research and development project.
Changed: 5/4/2025 00:52, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Abstract
In the original language
Parallel corpora are still crucial to train effective Machine Translation systems. This is even more true for low-resource language pairs, for which Neural Machine Translation has been shown to be less robust to domain mismatch and noise. Due to time and resource constraints, parallel corpora are mostly created with sentence alignment methods which automatically infer alignments. Recent work focused on state-of-the-art pre-trained sentence embeddings-based methods which are available only for a tiny fraction of the world’s languages. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of four widely used algorithms on the low-resource English-Yorùbá language pair against a multidomain benchmark parallel corpus on two experiments involving 1-to-1 alignments with and without reordering. We find that, at least for this language pair, earlier and simpler methods are more suited to the task, all the while not requiring additional data or resources. We also report that the methods we evaluated perform differently across distinct domains, thus indicating that some approach may be better for a specific domain or textual structure.