J 2025

Client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy : A qualitative meta-analysis

LADMANOVÁ, Michaela, Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK, Ladislav TIMULÁK, Klára JONÁŠOVÁ, Barbora KUBANTOVÁ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy : A qualitative meta-analysis

Autoři

LADMANOVÁ, Michaela, Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK, Ladislav TIMULÁK, Klára JONÁŠOVÁ, Barbora KUBANTOVÁ, Petr MIKOŠKA, Lucia POLAKOVSKÁ a Robert ELLIOTT

Vydání

The Lancet Psychiatry, London, Elsevier, 2025, 2215-0366

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Organizace

Fakulta sociálních studií – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář

UT WoS

001391247300001

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85212082366

Klíčová slova anglicky

psychotherapy outcomes; client perspective; qualitative meta-analysis

Návaznosti

CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583, interní kód Repo. EH22_008/0004583, projekt VaV.
Změněno: 31. 1. 2025 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Anotace

V originále

Background Psychotherapy outcomes are typically measured in terms of symptom relief. However, this method might overlook important changes from clients' perspectives when they are asked to report on them. A more client-centred approach might bring a deeper understanding of psychotherapy outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes identified by clients within qualitative psychotherapy research. Methods The PsycArticles, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE Complete databases were searched for English language studies published until Nov 11, 2023. Additional studies were identified through references in the primary studies and previous meta-analyses or systematic reviews. Search terms were related to psychotherapy and counselling, clients' or patients' experiences, psychotherapy outcomes and changes, post-treatment perspectives, and types of qualitative methods. Qualitative studies on client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy were included. Findings related to clients' perceptions of psychotherapy outcomes were extracted (by ML and checked by TR and LT) and analysed (by all authors) using the descriptive–interpretative meta-analytic approach. All authors have personally experienced psychotherapy as clients. This study was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021277330). Findings We included 177 studies in the qualitative meta-analysis, from 24 countries, including descriptions from 2908 clients. Most of the studies were of good quality; they covered a wide range of therapeutic approaches and diagnoses. The descriptions of psychotherapy outcomes were classified into 60 meta-categories and grouped into ten clusters. These clusters related to clients' relational and social functioning; their emotional functioning; self-awareness, self-understanding, and more adaptive cognitive processing; behavioural functioning; developing their own resources; clients' attitudes towards themselves; generally embracing life; symptom and problem change; and more general wellbeing. The tenth cluster was outcomes that could not be clearly attributed to psychotherapy, which was considered outside the scope of this study. Interpretation The meta-analysis showed that clients value outcome dimensions beyond symptom reduction, such as deeper self-understanding, enhanced self-agency, and greater social engagement. By examining psychotherapy outcomes across various diagnoses and therapeutic approaches, we highlight limitations in traditional outcome measures, showing the need for more comprehensive, client-centred assessment tools and the value of incorporating qualitative methods into understanding dimensions of change.

Přiložené soubory