J 2024

Identifying pesticides of high concern for ecosystem, plant, animal, and human health: A comprehensive field study across Europe and Argentina

ALAOUI, Abdallah, Florian CHRIST, Vera SILVA, Anne VESTED, Vivi SCHLUNSSEN et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Identifying pesticides of high concern for ecosystem, plant, animal, and human health: A comprehensive field study across Europe and Argentina

Authors

ALAOUI, Abdallah, Florian CHRIST, Vera SILVA, Anne VESTED, Vivi SCHLUNSSEN, Neus GONZALEZ, Lingtong GAI, Nelson ABRANTES, Isabelle BALDI, Mathilde BUREAU, Paula HARKES, Trine NORGAARD, Irene NAVARRO, de la Torre ADRIAN, Paloma SANZ, Maria Angeles MARTINEZ, Jakub HOFMAN, Igor PASKOVIC, Marija Polic PASKOVIC, Matjaz GLAVAN, Esperanza Huerta LWANGA, Virginia Carolina APARICIO, Isabel CAMPOS, Francisco ALCON, Josefa CONTRERAS, Daniele MANDRIOLI, Daria SGARGI, Paul T. J. SCHEEPERS, Coen RITSEMA and Violette GEISSEN

Edition

Science of the Total Environment, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 2024, 0048-9697

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Article in a journal

Country of publisher

Netherlands

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

References:

Organization

Přírodovědecká fakulta – Repository – Repository

UT WoS

001276911600001

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85198727978

Keywords in English

SPRINT project; Mixture of pesticide residues; Detection frequency; Median concentration; Hazard

Links

862568, interní kód Repo.
Changed: 18/9/2024 00:51, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

V originále

The widespread and excessive use of pesticides in modern agricultural practices has caused pesticide contamination of the environment, animals, and humans, with confirmed serious health consequences. This study aimed to identify the 20 most critical substances based on an analysis of detection frequency (DF) and median concentrations (MC) across environmental and biological matrices. A sampling campaign was conducted across 10 case study sites in Europe and 1 in Argentina, each encompassing conventional and organic farming systems. We analysed 209 active substances in a total of 4609 samples. All substances ranked among the 20 most critical were detected in silicon wristbands worn by humans and animals and indoor dust from both farming systems. Five of them were detected in all environmental matrices. Overall, higher values of DF and MC, including in the blood plasma of animals and humans, were recorded in samples of conventional compared to organic farms. The differences between farming systems were greater in the environmental samples and less in animal and human samples. Ten substances were detected in animal blood plasma from conventional farms and eight in animal blood plasma from organic farms. Two of those, detected in both farming systems, are classified as hazardous for mammals (acute). Five substances detected in animal blood plasma from organic farms and seven detected in animal blood plasma from conventional farms are classified as hazardous for mammals (dietary). Three substances detected in human blood plasma are classified as carcinogens. Seven of the substances detected in human blood plasma are classified as endocrine disruptors. Six substances, of which five were detected in human blood plasma, are hazardous for reproduction/development. Efforts are needed to elucidate the unknown effects of mixtures, and it is crucial that such research also considers biocides and banned substances, which constitute a baseline of contamination that adds to the effect of substances used in agriculture.

Files attached