J 2024

Beyond target chemicals: updating the NORMAN prioritisation scheme to support the EU chemicals strategy with semi-quantitative suspect/non-target screening data

DULIO, Valeria, Nikiforos ALYGIZAKIS, Kelsey Kwong Pui NG, Emma L. SCHYMANSKI, Sandrine ANDRES et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Beyond target chemicals: updating the NORMAN prioritisation scheme to support the EU chemicals strategy with semi-quantitative suspect/non-target screening data

Autoři

DULIO, Valeria, Nikiforos ALYGIZAKIS, Kelsey Kwong Pui NG, Emma L. SCHYMANSKI, Sandrine ANDRES, Katrin VORKAMP, Juliane HOLLENDER, Saskia FINCKH, Reza AALIZADEH, Lutz AHRENS, Elodie BOUHOULLE, Lubos CIRKA, Anja DERKSEN, Genevieve DEVILLER, Anja DUFFEK, Mar ESPERANZA, Stellan FISCHER, Qiuguo FU, Pablo GAGO-FERRERO, Peter HAGLUND, Marion JUNGHANS, Stefan A. E. KOOLS, Jan KOSCHORRECK, Benjamin LOPEZ, Miren Lopez DE ALDA, Giuseppe MASCOLO, Cecile MIEGE, Leonard OSTE, Simon TOOLE, Pawel ROSTKOWSKI, Tobias SCHULZE, Kerry SIMS, Laetitia SIX, Jaroslav SLOBODNÍK, Pierre-Francois STAUB, Gerard STROOMBERG, Nikolaos S. THOMAIDIS, Anne TOGOLA, Giorgio TOMASI a Peter C. VON DER OHE

Vydání

Environmental Sciences Europe, New York, Springer, 2024, 2190-4707

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Organizace

Přírodovědecká fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář

UT WoS

001246006100002

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85195904334

Klíčová slova anglicky

Contaminants of emerging concern; Retrospective suspect screening; Chemical prioritisation; Environmental risk assessment; NORMAN Database System

Návaznosti

859891, interní kód Repo.
Změněno: 5. 8. 2024 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Anotace

V originále

gt; 11 million data points. The final prioritisation results identified 677 substances as high priority for further actions, 7455 as medium priority and 326 with potentially lower priority for actions. Among the remaining substances, ca. 37,000 substances should be considered of medium priority with uncertainty, while it was not possible to conclude for 19,000 substances due to insufficient information from target monitoring and uncertainty in the identification from suspect screening. A high degree of agreement was observed between the categories assigned via target analysis and suspect screening-based prioritisation. Suspect screening was a valuable complementary approach to target analysis, helping to prioritise thousands of substances that are insufficiently investigated in current monitoring programmes. Conclusions This updated prioritisation workflow responds to the increasing use of suspect screening techniques. It can be adapted to different environmental compartments and can support regulatory obligations, including the identification of specific pollutants in river basins and the marine environments, as well as the confirmation of environmental occurrence levels predicted by modelling tools.

Přiložené soubory