Přehled o publikaci
2024
Beyond target chemicals: updating the NORMAN prioritisation scheme to support the EU chemicals strategy with semi-quantitative suspect/non-target screening data
DULIO, Valeria, Nikiforos ALYGIZAKIS, Kelsey Kwong Pui NG, Emma L. SCHYMANSKI, Sandrine ANDRES et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Beyond target chemicals: updating the NORMAN prioritisation scheme to support the EU chemicals strategy with semi-quantitative suspect/non-target screening data
Autoři
DULIO, Valeria, Nikiforos ALYGIZAKIS, Kelsey Kwong Pui NG, Emma L. SCHYMANSKI, Sandrine ANDRES, Katrin VORKAMP, Juliane HOLLENDER, Saskia FINCKH, Reza AALIZADEH, Lutz AHRENS, Elodie BOUHOULLE, Lubos CIRKA, Anja DERKSEN, Genevieve DEVILLER, Anja DUFFEK, Mar ESPERANZA, Stellan FISCHER, Qiuguo FU, Pablo GAGO-FERRERO, Peter HAGLUND, Marion JUNGHANS, Stefan A. E. KOOLS, Jan KOSCHORRECK, Benjamin LOPEZ, Miren Lopez DE ALDA, Giuseppe MASCOLO, Cecile MIEGE, Leonard OSTE, Simon TOOLE, Pawel ROSTKOWSKI, Tobias SCHULZE, Kerry SIMS, Laetitia SIX, Jaroslav SLOBODNÍK, Pierre-Francois STAUB, Gerard STROOMBERG, Nikolaos S. THOMAIDIS, Anne TOGOLA, Giorgio TOMASI a Peter C. VON DER OHE
Vydání
Environmental Sciences Europe, New York, Springer, 2024, 2190-4707
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Organizace
Přírodovědecká fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
UT WoS
001246006100002
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85195904334
Klíčová slova anglicky
Contaminants of emerging concern; Retrospective suspect screening; Chemical prioritisation; Environmental risk assessment; NORMAN Database System
Návaznosti
859891, interní kód Repo.
Změněno: 5. 8. 2024 00:50, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Anotace
V originále
gt; 11 million data points. The final prioritisation results identified 677 substances as high priority for further actions, 7455 as medium priority and 326 with potentially lower priority for actions. Among the remaining substances, ca. 37,000 substances should be considered of medium priority with uncertainty, while it was not possible to conclude for 19,000 substances due to insufficient information from target monitoring and uncertainty in the identification from suspect screening. A high degree of agreement was observed between the categories assigned via target analysis and suspect screening-based prioritisation. Suspect screening was a valuable complementary approach to target analysis, helping to prioritise thousands of substances that are insufficiently investigated in current monitoring programmes. Conclusions This updated prioritisation workflow responds to the increasing use of suspect screening techniques. It can be adapted to different environmental compartments and can support regulatory obligations, including the identification of specific pollutants in river basins and the marine environments, as well as the confirmation of environmental occurrence levels predicted by modelling tools.