J 2023

Access to In-Vehicle Data in The Maelstrom of Protected Rights and Legitimate Interests as an Urgent Challenge for EU Law

ŠMEJKAL, Václav

Základní údaje

Originální název

Access to In-Vehicle Data in The Maelstrom of Protected Rights and Legitimate Interests as an Urgent Challenge for EU Law

Název česky

Přístup k auty generovaným datům v kontextu střetu chráněných práv a zájmů jako neodkladná výzva pro právo EU

Autoři

ŠMEJKAL, Václav

Vydání

Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, Faculty of European Studies, Babes-Bolyai University, 2023, 2247-0514

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50200 5.2 Economics and Business

Stát vydavatele

Rumunsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Organizace

Škoda Auto Vysoká Škola o.p.s. – Repozitář

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85185272178

Klíčová slova anglicky

In-vehicle data; competition; Data protection; privacy; data sharing; connected cars

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 29. 7. 2024 22:22, Barbora Dobrá

Anotace

V originále

What will be the mode of the data that today's connected cars accumulate has become a critical issue for the entire automotive sector and its related supply and service industries. If quanta of highly usable data remain largely with car manufacturers, they will become gatekeepers and the entire aftermarket will either fall into complete dependence on them or lose the ability to innovate and compete. Aftermarket leaders and EU institutions are working to ensure that this data is shared from manufacturers to other supply and service providers. However, the most sensitive data is of a personal nature and its widespread sharing in the name of open competition may conflict with the right to privacy and the protection of drivers' personal data. Protecting both competition and data at the same time can be awfully expensive, with negative impacts on consumption and available mobility. This paper seeks to explain this straitjacket of three not entirely consistent requirements and to show the possibilities for emerging legislation within its framework. It shows that there are not only convincing arguments but also strong lobbies behind each of the demands, which makes finding a compromise solution even more difficult. At the end of the analysis, a solution is proposed which, taking into account all the constraints, appears to be the least detrimental to the preservation of all protected rights and legitimate interests.

Přiložené soubory