Přehled o publikaci
2023
Measuring symptom acceptance : Psychometric evaluation of ‘chronic pain acceptance questionnaire – symptoms’ in a Czech clinical sample
KLOCEK, Adam, Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK and Hynek CÍGLERBasic information
Original name
Measuring symptom acceptance : Psychometric evaluation of ‘chronic pain acceptance questionnaire – symptoms’ in a Czech clinical sample
Authors
KLOCEK, Adam, Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK and Hynek CÍGLER
Edition
Československá psychologie, Praha, Academia, 2023, 0009-062X
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Organization
Fakulta sociálních studií – Repository – Repository
UT WoS
000966526500001
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85149233038
Keywords in English
chronic difficulties; symptom acceptance; factor analysis; Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
Links
GA18-08512S, research and development project.
Changed: 22/9/2023 04:12, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Abstract
V originále
Objective. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire – Symptoms (CPAQ-S, 20 items) measures patients’ acceptance of their symptoms. The questionnaire was created by reframing the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-20 (CPAQ-20). This study describes the Czech validation of the full and short CPAQ-S forms. Sample and settings. The final sample consisted of 368 patients (71% female) recruited at seven clinical sites in the Czech Republic. Hypotheses. A hypothesized two-dimensional factor structure (Activity Engagement and Symptom Willingness) was tested together with other theoretically relevant factor solutions. Statistical analyses. An ordinal confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were employed. Results. None of the theory-driven factor structures were confirmed in the CPAQ-S-20, and exploratory factor analysis did not yield any satisfactory factor solution. However, an eight-item version (CPAQ-S-8) was derived based on the factor analysis that was characterized by good psychometric properties even when retaining important facets of the expected two-factor structure (i.e., Activity Engagement and Symptom Willingness). Limitations. While the sample heterogeneity was conceived as a strength of the study, an underlying noninvariance across different types of complaints could have caused unsatisfactory functioning of the scale.