Přehled o publikaci
2021
Whose Landscape Is It? Remapping Memory and History in Interwar Central Europe
VESZPRÉMI, NóraZákladní údaje
Originální název
Whose Landscape Is It? Remapping Memory and History in Interwar Central Europe
Autoři
VESZPRÉMI, Nóra
Vydání
Austrian History Yearbook, Cambridge University Press, 2021, 0067-2378
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Organizace
Filozofická fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
UT WoS
000651144400015
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85104076231
Klíčová slova anglicky
landscape; Hungary; Czechoslovakia; revisionism; trianon; mental maps; memory sudies; memory politics;picturesque
Návaznosti
786314, interní kód Repo.
Změněno: 17. 5. 2022 04:14, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
Anotace
V originále
After the collapse of the Habsburg Empire and the sanctioning of new national borders in 1920, the successor states faced the controversial task of reconceptualizing the idea of national territory. Images of historically significant landscapes played a crucial role in this process. Employing the concept of mental maps, this article explores how such images shaped the connections between place, memory, and landscape in Hungary and Czechoslovakia. Hungarian revisionist publications demonstrate how Hungarian nationalists visualized the organic integrity of “Greater Hungary,” while also implicitly adapting historical memory to the new geopolitical situation. As a counterpoint, images of the Váh region produced in interwar Czechoslovakia reveal how an opposing political agenda gave rise to a different imagery, while drawing on shared cultural traditions from the imperial past. Finally, the case study of Dévény/Devín/Theben shows how the idea of being positioned “between East and West” lived on in overlapping but politically opposed mental maps in the interwar period. By examining the cracks and continuities in the picturesque landscape tradition after 1918, the article offers new insight into the similarities and differences of nation-building processes from the perspective of visual culture.