Přehled o publikaci
2017
Psychodiagnostic tests and their use: a copyright perspective
MYŠKA, MatějBasic information
Original name
Psychodiagnostic tests and their use: a copyright perspective
Name (in English)
Psychodiagnostic tests and their use: a copyright perspective
Authors
MYŠKA, Matěj (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
1. vyd. Zlín, Work potential and its changes over time, p. 453-462, 10 pp. 2017
Publisher
Univerzita Tomáše Baťi
Other information
Language
Czech
Type of outcome
Proceedings paper
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form
electronic version available online
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/17:00113773
Organization
Právnická fakulta – Repository – Repository
ISBN
978-80-7454-714-0
UT WoS
000473811400041
Keywords in English
copyright; author's work; exceptions and limitations of copyright; scientific research; psychodiagnostic test
Changed: 11/9/2020 02:09, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík
V originále
The aim of this paper is to provide a brief overview of problematic issues related to the use of the psychodiagnostic test. The first part deals with the question of when and under what conditions psychodiagnostic tests can be protected by copyright law at all. Assessing the existence of a work with the help of the "test of the conceptual features of a work" (Telec, 1997b) is crucial for the application of legal protection provided by the Copyright Act. The next part of the paper analyses when and under what conditions the object of protection (i.e. the work) to which the researcher does not exercise the relevant rights may be used. This may be allowed either on the basis of a license agreement or on the basis of an exception or limitation to copyright law, in particular the quotation exception. The so-called three-step test that could be understood as a general material condition for the application of all legal exceptions and limitations of copyright is introduced and explained. In conclusion, the paper recommends a rather defensive and restrictive approach to non-contractual institutes allowing the use of the work in order to prevent potential disputes. An alternative to commercially-provided psychodiagnostic tests may be the use of psychodiagnostic tests that are available under the so-called public licenses. Even in this case, however, it is necessary to respect the conditions set by the author in the selected license (such as the prohibition of commercial use), as non-compliance leads to termination of the license and ultimately to infringement of copyright.
In English
The aim of this paper is to provide a brief overview of problematic issues related to the use of the psychodiagnostic test. The first part deals with the question of when and under what conditions psychodiagnostic tests can be protected by copyright law at all. Assessing the existence of a work with the help of the "test of the conceptual features of a work" (Telec, 1997b) is crucial for the application of legal protection provided by the Copyright Act. The next part of the paper analyses when and under what conditions the object of protection (i.e. the work) to which the researcher does not exercise the relevant rights may be used. This may be allowed either on the basis of a license agreement or on the basis of an exception or limitation to copyright law, in particular the quotation exception. The so-called three-step test that could be understood as a general material condition for the application of all legal exceptions and limitations of copyright is introduced and explained. In conclusion, the paper recommends a rather defensive and restrictive approach to non-contractual institutes allowing the use of the work in order to prevent potential disputes. An alternative to commercially-provided psychodiagnostic tests may be the use of psychodiagnostic tests that are available under the so-called public licenses. Even in this case, however, it is necessary to respect the conditions set by the author in the selected license (such as the prohibition of commercial use), as non-compliance leads to termination of the license and ultimately to infringement of copyright.