NOVÁK, Miroslav. Systemes partisans competitifs: quelle divergence entre Duverger et Sartori? (Competitive party systems: is there a difference betwween Duverger and Sartori?). Revue française de science politique. 2015, vol. 65, No 3, p. 447-467. ISSN 0035-2950. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.653.0451.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Systemes partisans competitifs: quelle divergence entre Duverger et Sartori?
Name (in English) Competitive party systems: is there a difference betwween Duverger and Sartori?
Authors NOVÁK, Miroslav (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Revue française de science politique, 2015, 0035-2950.
Other information
Original language French
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50601 Political science
Country of publisher France
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/27590101:_____/15:00000002
Organization CEVRO Institut, z.ú. – Repository
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.653.0451
Keywords in English party systems; Duverger; Sartori
Changed by Changed by: Doc. PhDr. Miloš Brunclík, Ph.D., učo 2378. Changed: 25/4/2019 15:25.
Abstract
Ce texte refute le « sens commun » selon lequel Duverger se contenterait d’une classification banale des systemes partisans pluralistes (bipartisme-multipartisme). On montre ici, entre autres, que : 1/ des 1951, Duverger propose une typologie plus raffinee des systemes partisans qui ressemble a la typologie posterieure de Sartori ; 2/ a l’encontre de ce qu’affirme Hazan, la conception du « paradoxe du centre », formulee par Duverger des 1951, est tout aussi « contre-intuitive » que la conception de Sartori ; 3/ a l’instar de Sartori, Duverger met l’accent sur le « fonctionnement » des systemes partisans, mais Sartori a essaye de se demarquer de Duverger en assurant que son approche est profondement divergente ; 4/ il faut revoir nos schemas de l’evolution de la science politique et reconnaître l’apport fondamental de Duverger a la theorie des systemes partisans.
Abstract (in English)
This article refutes the conventional wisdom that Duverger’s classification of pluralistic party systems is simplistic because it recognises only bipartism and multipartism as categories. It demonstrates, first, that by 1951 Duverger had already introduced a more sophisticated typology of pluralistic party systems, one which resembled the one later developed by Sartori; second, that Duverger’s concept of the “paradox of the centre” is no less “counter-intuitive” than Sartori’s concept; third, that – like Sartori –Duverger emphasises the “functioning” of party systems. Sartori, however, dissociated himself from Duverger and attempted to propagate the belief that his approach was fundamentally different. Finally, the article makes the argument that we should revise our simplistic understandings of the development of political science and recognise Duverger’s essential contribution to the theory of party systems
Print
Add to clipboard Displayed: 27/4/2024 04:25