KORPAS, David and Jana HALUZÍKOVÁ. Usability of Volume Pulse Wave Biosignal. IFMBE Proceedings. Singapore: Springer, Singapore, vol. 68, No 2, p. 121-124. ISSN 1680-0737. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_21. 2018.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Usability of Volume Pulse Wave Biosignal
Authors KORPAS, David (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Jana HALUZÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition IFMBE Proceedings, Singapore, Springer, Singapore, 2018, 1680-0737.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 20601 Medical engineering
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW Usability of Volume Pulse Wave Biosignal
RIV identification code RIV/47813059:19510/18:A0000101
Organization Fakulta veřejných politik v Opavě – Slezská univerzita v Opavě – Repository
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_21
UT WoS 000449742700021
Keywords in English Biosignal processing; Measurement techniques; Pulse wave
Changed by Changed by: Bc. Nikol Maďová, učo 1144. Changed: 25/4/2019 09:35.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to show the usability of volume pulse wave measurement on superficial arteries, using a method as close as possible to manual palpation. The parameters evaluated can be generally assessed from the time domain, derivations, velocity, or frequency domain. In the time domain, a number of wave proportions can be measured. In this study, the parameters were derived from time and amplitude measurement of the pulse wave run. The mean coefficients of variation in (%) of parameters in one pulse waveform were: crest time 11.8; systolic amplitude 8.45; relative crest time 11.38; interwave distance 12.97; relative dicrotic amplitude 23.1; relative dicrotic time 7.15; augmentation index 13.23; PWV 6.76. The mean coefficients of variation in (%) of parameters in the long-term measurement were: crest time 9.17; systolic amplitude 10.79; relative crest time 6.91; interwave distance 3.77; relative dicrotic amplitude 11.37; relative dicrotic time 1.87; augmentation index 4.58; PWV 5.87. The variations measured are very large. As a result, it is not possible to accurately and quantitatively evaluate the pulse wave measured by palpation. The results show that the coefficients of variation for the parameters of the volume pulse wave biosignal can increase up to double-digit values.
Print
Add to clipboard Displayed: 23/4/2024 08:54