D 2017

Public Policy under the Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention as an Instrument Protecting Constitutional Values

DRLIČKOVÁ, Klára

Basic information

Original name

Public Policy under the Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention as an Instrument Protecting Constitutional Values

Authors

DRLIČKOVÁ, Klára (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Riga, Constitutional Values in Contemporary Legal Space II, p. 196 - 209, 14 pp. 2017

Publisher

University of Latvia Press

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Proceedings paper

Field of Study

Legal sciences

Country of publisher

Latvia

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

Publication form

electronic version available online

References:

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/17:00095031

Organization

Právnická fakulta – Repository – Repository

ISBN

978-9934-18-230-3

UT WoS

000409302200017

Keywords in English

New York Convention; public policy; international public policy; right to a fair trial; independence and impartiality of arbitrators; right to present one’s case

Links

GA15-08182S, research and development project.
Changed: 4/9/2020 15:14, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

V originále

The aim of this paper is to analyse public policy under the Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention as an instrument protecting the right to a fair trial. The core part of the paper is based on the analysis of selected case law of national courts applying the New York Convention. Firstly, the concept of public policy under Article the V(2)(b) and the principles of its interpretation are analysed in general. In this part, the standard of international public policy is explained. The standard of international public policy does not represent an international or supranational standard. It is still the standard based on national law which is applicable to foreign arbitral awards. Secondly, the right to a fair trial within the context of public policy is assessed. This part is mainly based on the selected case law of national courts. Concerning the right to a fair trial, most of the courts use the standard of international public policy. The national courts generally acknowledge that the right to an independent and impartial arbitrator, as well as the right to present one’s case (with the exception of the lack of reasoning in the award) form part of (international) public policy within the meaning of the Article V(2)(b). However, the threshold for finding the violation of (international) public policy is high.

Files attached