Informační systém Repo
REMSOVÁ, Kateřina. Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration. In COFOLA International 2016: Resolution of International Disputes, Public Law in the Context of Immigrtion Crisis: Conference Proceedings. Brno: Masaryk University. s. 150-166. ISBN 978-80-210-8356-1. 2016.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration
Autoři REMSOVÁ, Kateřina (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání Brno, COFOLA International 2016: Resolution of International Disputes, Public Law in the Context of Immigrtion Crisis: Conference Proceedings, od s. 150-166, 17 s. 2016.
Nakladatel Masaryk University
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Stať ve sborníku
Obor Právní vědy
Stát vydavatele Česká republika
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání tištěná verze "print"
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14220/16:00092715
Organizace Právnická fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
ISBN 978-80-210-8356-1
UT WoS 000460199300009
Klíčová slova anglicky Arbitration in employment relationship; Consumer arbitration; Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards; Protection of the employee; Employment disputes of property nature
Návaznosti MUNI/A/1075/2015, interní kód Repo.
Změnil Změnil: RNDr. Daniel Jakubík, učo 139797. Změněno: 3. 9. 2020 16:31.
Anotace
The paper deals with different approaches to consumer and employee in terms of the protection granted to them in domestic and international arbitration. Czech Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards applies to both domestic and international arbitration and assumes standards of consumer protection of European union law into the consumer arbitration. Employee, however, this Act provides no protection. In a post on the last year of this conference I addressed the issue of arbitrability of individual employment disputes and I conclude that employment disputes of property nature only are arbitrable. This follow paper discusses the differences between consumer and employment disputes of property nature and addresses the question of the reasons why employee are not granted the same level of protection as consumer. The aim of this paper is comparison of regulation of consumer arbitration and arbitration in employment relations in terms of the scope of protection afforded by Act to consumer or employee and finding reasons why an employee does not obtain similar protection as a consumer in the arbitration.
Zobrazeno: 28. 3. 2024 13:04