Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer
and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech
Arbitration

CSLog in Log in (EduId)

Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of ...

Přehled o publikaci

D 2016

Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina

Basic information

Original name

Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration

Authors

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Brno, COFOLA International 2016: Resolution of International Disputes, Public Law in the Context of Immigrtion Crisis: Conference Proceedings, p. 150-166, 17 pp. 2016

Publisher

Masaryk University

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Proceedings paper

Field of Study

Legal sciences

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

Publication form

printed version "print"

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/16:00092715

Organization

Právnická fakulta – Repository – Repository

ISBN

978-80-210-8356-1

UT WoS

000460199300009

Keywords in English

Arbitration in employment relationship; Consumer arbitration; Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards; Protection of the employee; Employment disputes of property nature

Links

MUNI/A/1075/2015, interní kód Repo.

Changed: 3/9/2020 16:31, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

V originále

The paper deals with different approaches to consumer and employee in terms of the protection granted to them in domestic and international arbitration. Czech Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards applies to both domestic and international arbitration and assumes standards of consumer protection of European union law into the consumer arbitration. Employee, however, this Act provides no protection. In a post on the last year of this conference I addressed the issue of arbitrability of individual employment disputes and I conclude that employment disputes of property nature only are arbitrable. This follow paper discusses the differences between consumer and employment disputes of property nature and addresses the question of the reasons why employee are not granted the same level of protection as consumer. The aim of this paper is comparison of regulation of consumer arbitration and arbitration in employment relations in terms of the scope of protection afforded by Act to consumer or employee and finding reasons why an employee does not obtain similar protection as a consumer in the arbitration.

Files attached

http://is.muni.cz/repo/1367071/COFOLAaj_2016.pdf File version

https://is.muni.cz/publication/1367071/COFOLAaj_2016.pdf File version

Cite

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina. Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration. In COFOLA International 2016: Resolution of International Disputes, Public Law in the Context of Immigrtion Crisis: Conference Proceedings. Brno: Masaryk University, 2016, p. 150-166. ISBN 978-80-210-8356-1.

@inproceedings{25130,
   author = {Remsová, Kateřina},
   address = {Brno},
   booktitle = {COFOLA International 2016: Resolution of International Disputes, Public Law in the Context of Immigrtion Crisis: Conference Proceedings},
   keywords = {Arbitration in employment relationship; Consumer arbitration; Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards; Protection of the employee; Employment disputes of property nature},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Brno},
   isbn = {978-80-210-8356-1},
   pages = {150-166},
   publisher = {Masaryk University},
   title = {Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration},
   year = {2016}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 25130
AU  - Remsová, Kateřina
PY  - 2016
TI  - Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration
PB  - Masaryk University
CY  - Brno
SN  - 9788021083561
KW  - Arbitration in employment relationship
KW  - Consumer arbitration
KW  - Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
KW  - Protection of the employee
KW  - Employment disputes of property nature
N2  - The paper deals with different approaches to consumer and employee in terms of the protection granted to them in domestic and international arbitration. Czech Act on Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards applies to both domestic and international arbitration and assumes standards of consumer protection of European union law into the consumer arbitration. Employee, however, this Act provides no protection. In a post on the last year of this conference I addressed the issue of arbitrability of individual employment disputes and I conclude that employment disputes of property nature only are arbitrable. This follow paper discusses the differences between consumer and employment disputes of property nature and addresses the question of the reasons why employee are not granted the same level of protection as consumer. The aim of this paper is comparison of regulation of consumer arbitration and arbitration in employment relations in terms of the scope of protection afforded by Act to consumer or employee and finding reasons why an employee does not obtain similar protection as a consumer in the arbitration.
ER  -

REMSOVÁ, Kateřina. Questions about the Differences between Protection of Consumer and Worker from the perspective of International and Czech Arbitration. In \textit{COFOLA International 2016: Resolution of International Disputes, Public Law in the Context of Immigrtion Crisis: Conference Proceedings}. Brno: Masaryk University, 2016, p.~150-166. ISBN~978-80-210-8356-1.