D 2015

How did constitutional court deal with judging payback period of investment to solar power plants

VALACHOVÁ, Martina

Basic information

Original name

How did constitutional court deal with judging payback period of investment to solar power plants

Authors

VALACHOVÁ, Martina (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

1. vyd. Brno, System of financial law: general part, p. 414-425, 12 pp. 2015

Publisher

Masarykova univerzita, Právnická fakulta

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Proceedings paper

Field of Study

Legal sciences

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

Publication form

printed version "print"

References:

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/15:00089083

Organization

Právnická fakulta – Repository – Repository

ISBN

978-80-210-7826-0

UT WoS

000379380800034

Keywords in English

Solar Tax; Discounted Payback Period; Weighted Average Cost of Capital

Links

MUNI/A/0856/2013, interní kód Repo.
Changed: 2/9/2020 04:24, RNDr. Daniel Jakubík

Abstract

V originále

This contribution deals with approach of Constitutional Court to assessing payback period of investment to solar power plant projects in Czech Republic. The main aim of the article is to confirm the hypothesis that Constitutional Court of Czech Republic failed when judging payback period of investment, because it based his verdict on incorrect evidence provided by Energy Regulatory Office. This contribution will explain the circumstances of implementing solar tax and emphasize individual mistakes in Constitutional Court's and Energy Regulatory Office's actions. To confirm the hypothesis stated above methods of comparison, synthesis and analysis and literature review were used.

Files attached

http://is.muni.cz/repo/1301455/general-part.pdf File version
https://is.muni.cz/publication/1301455/general-part.pdf File version