Podrobný výpis o publikaci

FUJDA, Milan. „Religion“ in Sociological Context : Grounding the Separation (poster). In Social Relations in Turbulent Times (10th Conference of the European Sociological Association). 2011.

Další formáty: BibTeX LaTeX RIS

Základní údaje
Originální název	„Religion“ in Sociological Context : Grounding the Separation (poster)
Autoři	FUJDA, Milan (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání	Social Relations in Turbulent Times (10th Conference of the European Sociological Association), 2011.

Další údaje
Originální jazyk	angličtina
Typ výsledku	Prezentace na konferencích
Obor	Sociologie, demografie
Stát vydavatele	Švýcarsko
Utajení	není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW	URL
Kód RIV	RIV/00216224:14210/11:00053455
Organizace	Filozofická fakulta – Masarykova univerzita – Repozitář
Klíčová slova anglicky	religion;secularization;definition;theory;social order
Návaznosti	MUNI/21/FUJ/2011, interní kód Repo.
Změnil	Změnil: RNDr. Daniel Jakubík, učo 139797. Změněno: 1. 9. 2020 11:41.

Anotace
Sociologists of religion widely concur that Sociology of Religion is a marginal discipline within contemporary Sociology. Some of them hope for better future and connected this hope with spreading doubts concerning the secularization theory. These doubts, on the other hand, mean significant theoretical challenges and put under questions foundations of the discipline. Following analysis shows that drawing boundary between religion and non-religion – as an act of setting up the object and an independent agenda of the discipline – might have been a premature act. In its view many contemporary troubles of the discipline might be solved by revising this premature decision and by re-emphasising fundamental issues of Sociology (i.e. dynamics of social ordering) with the Sociology of Religion.

Anotace

Sociologists of religion widely concur that Sociology of Religion is a marginal discipline within contemporary Sociology. Some of them hope for better future and connected this hope with spreading doubts concerning the secularization theory. These doubts, on the other hand, mean significant theoretical challenges and put under questions foundations of the discipline. Following analysis shows that drawing boundary between religion and non-religion – as an act of setting up the object and an independent agenda of the discipline – might have been a premature act. In its view many contemporary troubles of the discipline might be solved by revising this premature decision and by re-emphasising fundamental issues of Sociology (i.e. dynamics of social ordering) with the Sociology of Religion.